Skip to content
Valid for Spanish student visa applications · study stays of 3–14 months · meets consulate insurance requirements Mi Sanitas
RD 1155/2024, arts. 52.1–52.2The modality rules, letter by letterRead at source 24 August 2026

Online and hybrid courses and the Spanish student visa: what the regulation actually requires

An online-only course does not carry a Spanish study authorisation. Every qualifying category in article 52.1 of Real Decreto 1155/2024 is written around in-person or majority-in-person study — but the figures the internet attaches to that rule ("50% in-person", "20 hours a week", "the hours must be quantified in your admission letter") are only partly in the text, and one of them is not in it at all. This page quotes what each letter of the regulation says about delivery mode, so you can check your course against the words rather than the folklore.

The 50% floor is real — but it is written into some letters, not all of them
No weekly hour count exists as a study requirement — full-time is defined as 90% of credits
Language courses under e).2.º must be delivered "de forma presencial" — fully in person
Start here

The blunt answer first

If your course is delivered entirely online, there is no study-visa route for it. The long-stay study authorisation in Real Decreto 1155/2024 exists to let you be in Spain for study that happens in Spain; each qualifying category in article 52.1, read at the consolidated BOE text on 24 August 2026, either names in-person delivery expressly or sets a floor on how much of the programme must be delivered in person. A student enrolled on a fully-online programme can study it from anywhere — which is exactly why it grounds no authorisation to stay.

Some readers of this page should not buy anything from us. If your course is online-only, you will not get a study visa for it, and a health insurance policy will not change that — the visa file fails on the course, not on the cover. We would rather tell you that before you spend anything than sell a policy to an application that cannot succeed. If your course is genuinely hybrid, read on: whether it qualifies depends on which letter of article 52.1 it sits under, and the letters do not say the same thing.

Two warnings about the folklore before the words themselves. First, the popular "50% in-person" rule is real but not universal — it is written into some letters of article 52.1 and absent from others. Second, the widely repeated "minimum 20 hours per week" is not in the regulation at all: we searched the consolidated text and the phrase does not occur. Where you meet an hours-per-week figure, you are reading a consulate's published practice or a school's marketing, not the reglamento — treat it accordingly, and check the source's own checklist rather than assuming a national rule.

The words

What each letter of article 52.1 says about delivery mode — verbatim

Article 52.1 sorts every stay of more than 90 days for study into five letters, and each carries its own modality wording. Here is the complete picture, quoted:

a) University degrees"Los estudios universitarios se podrán cursar en modalidad presencial o híbrida conforme a lo establecido en los planes de estudios correspondientes y en aplicación de la normativa vigente en materia de universidades." — presencial or hybrid, per the study plan and university law. Note what is missing: no percentage. For university degrees the text delegates the hybrid boundary to university regulation, and we have not read that regulation at source, so this page quotes no figure for it
a) Non-university higher educationThe same letter's next sentence does carry the floor: "El resto de los estudios superiores se podrán realizar en modalidad presencial o híbrida conforme a la normativa vigente en materia de educación, siempre que, al menos, el 50 por ciento de la programación impartida sea presencial." — at least half the delivered programme in person
b) Post-obligatory secondary"Los estudios se podrán cursar en modalidad presencial o semipresencial conforme a la normativa vigente en materia de educación, siempre que, al menos, el 50 por ciento de la programación impartida en los centros sea de manera presencial." — the same 50% floor, phrased for schools
c) Pupil-mobility programmesNo modality sentence at all — the category is defined by the recognised exchange programme, the responsible centre and the host family or residence (art. 53.1.c)), a structure that only makes sense in person. A "remote exchange" is not what this letter describes
d) VolunteeringNo modality sentence either — the category is a supervised service programme under a signed agreement (art. 53.1.d)). The regulation does not contemplate volunteering-by-videocall as grounds to stay in Spain
e).2.º Language coursesThe strictest wording in the article: teaching must be "impartidas, de forma presencial" — delivered in person, with no percentage and no hybrid option in the sub-case's own words. The language-school page takes the whole letter apart clause by clause
e) Other training activitiesLetter e)'s closing paragraph allows "modalidad presencial o semipresencial conforme a la normativa vigente en materia de formación, siempre que, al menos, el 50 por ciento de la programación impartida sea de manera presencial" — and e).5.º separately requires vocational grade-C training to be "una formación completa, ni modular ni parcial". How that closing paragraph interacts with e).2.º's stricter in-person wording is not spelled out in the text; we read the specific sub-case as governing language courses, and flag the interaction rather than resolving it

So the honest summary of the "50% rule": written for non-university higher education, post-obligatory secondary and training activities; not written for university degrees, where the study plan and university law govern; and overridden by stricter in-person wording for academy language courses. Anyone quoting one figure for all five letters has not read the article.

Full-time

The definition that is actually in the text: 90% of credits — not 20 hours

Letters a) and b) both require "un programa a tiempo completo" — a full-time programme. The regulation defines the term itself, in article 52.2, verbatim:

"Se entenderá por programa de estudios a tiempo completo aquel en el que el estudiante se haya matriculado al menos en el noventa por ciento de los créditos en el caso de estudios universitarios, o, en su defecto, en el noventa por ciento del programa de estudios."

Full-time means enrolment in at least ninety per cent of the credits — or, where credits do not apply, ninety per cent of the programme. That is the whole statutory definition. There is no weekly hour count in it, and no requirement that your admission letter quantify contact hours. Where do those claims come from? Consular practice, in at least one documented case: the Consulate General in San Francisco's student-visa page describes qualifying study as "Full-time (minimum 20 hours per week) studies" — one post's published shorthand, quoted and dated on the master's page, and a useful signal of what that post checks. But a post's checklist is that post's practice; posts differ, and the definition the regulation itself applies is the 90% one above. If your admission letter states your enrolment against the programme's credits or hours, it is evidencing the statutory definition; if your consulate's own checklist asks for weekly hours as well, that is the document to satisfy — check yours rather than assuming either way.

The same discipline applies to the third piece of folklore, that "the hours must be quantified in the admission letter". Article 53.1 asks for admission and proof of paid enrolment fees; article 35 adds the general file. Nothing in either article prescribes an hours breakdown in the letter. A school or consulate may still ask for one — practice again — but a page telling you Spanish law requires it is telling you something the law does not say.

Edge cases

Hybrid, online-with-exams, and the university language course

Three situations sit close to the line and deserve plain treatment:

A hybrid university degreePotentially fine — letter a) expressly allows "modalidad presencial o híbrida" for university studies, per the study plan and university regulation. The question to put to your university's international office is whether the programme, as your enrolment states it, satisfies the modality rules that govern it — and to your consulate or oficina, what evidence of that they want. If it qualifies, the category's rights are the strongest of the five — the master's and postgraduate page sets them out
An online course with in-person exams or a short residential weekAttending exams or a residential block does not turn an online programme into a presencial one. For the letters carrying the 50% floor, the test is the share of "la programación impartida" — the delivered programme — not the assessment venue. A course that is taught online and examined in person fails the words as written, and we are not going to pretend otherwise
A language course delivered by a universityThe Ministry's Instrucciones SEM 3/2025 class language studies taught by recognised higher-education institutions as estudios superiores under letter a) — but only when "impartidos de forma presencial", in person. The reclassification changes the category and its rights; it does not open an online route. Online language study grounds no authorisation from any direction

And the case that resolves itself: if you plan to study online from your own country, you do not need a Spanish visa, an insurance certificate or anything else on this site — you are not moving to Spain. If what you actually want is a stay of 90 days or less with some study in it, that is a different regime with different insurance logic, covered on the under-90-days page. If you want the online course and to live in Spain, the course will not carry you — the honest move is to choose a qualifying in-person or qualifying-hybrid programme, or a different route entirely; enrolling from inside Spain on a qualifying course has its own closed-list rules and deadlines, on the applying-from-inside-Spain page.

Insurance

Where insurance fits — and where it honestly doesn't

Insurance cannot rescue a non-qualifying course. Article 35(i) — a policy from an insurer authorised in Spain, benefits similar to the SNS basic common portfolio, valid for the whole intended stay, unpacked on the requirements page — is one item in a file whose foundation is the course itself. Fail the course test and the strongest certificate in the world is evidence attached to nothing.

There is a neat symmetry on our side of the counter, worth knowing because it protects you from a mis-sale: the Sanitas International Students plan requires proof of studies to contract — a matriculation or enrolment certificate with start and end dates. A student whose only enrolment is an online programme has no course in Spain to evidence, so the qualifying document is missing on the insurance side just as on the visa side. The plan insures students aged 14–35 on courses of 3 to 14 months, with zero copayments, no waiting periods, Dental 21, Blua 24/7 video consultations in English and €12,000 per person per year of worldwide emergency assistance; pricing starts from €42.71/month payable and the calculator gives the exact figure for your age, province and course length. Course durations of 4, 5 and 7 months are not currently selectable pending confirmation from Sanitas.

Eligibility, premium and policy terms are confirmed before the policy is issued. Whether a given programme qualifies under article 52.1 is decided by the consulate or the oficina de extranjería on the programme's documents — not by us, and not by the school selling the course.

Course qualifies? Then price the cover for it

If your programme is in-person or qualifying-hybrid and admission is in hand, the calculator prices the plan for your exact age, province and course length in two minutes — before you give us any contact details. If your course is online-only, keep your money.

Exact monthly and total price on screenProof of studies is what contracts the policyPolicies start on the 1st of a month, up to six months ahead
Get the price →
How this page is sourced

Read at source, 24 August 2026

Modality is where course-selling and visa reality collide, so every claim above is quoted from the instrument, and the boundaries the text leaves open are flagged, not resolved.

Real Decreto 1155/2024Art. 52.1 read in full — the modality sentences of letter a) (both quoted verbatim: university studies without a percentage; other higher studies with the 50% floor), letter b) (50% floor quoted), letters c) and d) (no modality wording — stated as an observed absence), e).2.º ("impartidas, de forma presencial"), e).5.º ("formación completa, ni modular ni parcial") and letter e)'s closing 50% paragraph — plus art. 52.2 (the 90%-of-credits full-time definition, quoted verbatim), arts. 53.1 and 35 — consolidated text read at BOE-A-2024-24099 on 24 August 2026
Negative findings"20 horas" / "veinte horas" as a weekly-STUDY requirement: zero occurrences in the consolidated text, searched and independently re-verified 24 August 2026 — the single "veinte horas" in the regulation is the work-contract minimum in the work-compatibility rules, not a course condition. No article prescribes an hours breakdown in the admission letter. The "minimum 20 hours per week" line documented on this site is the San Francisco consulate's published practice, quoted and dated on the master's page — practice, not law
Instrucciones SEM 3/2025Read in full in the signed original on 24 August 2026 — instrucción primera's classification of in-person university-delivered language studies as estudios superiores is quoted above. Cited in prose because the ministry's site rejects many automated requests; signed by the Secretary of State for Migration on 20 June 2025
Left open on purposeThe hybrid boundary for university degrees is delegated to "la normativa vigente en materia de universidades", which we have not read at source — this page quotes no percentage for university programmes and routes the question to the university and the deciding authority. The interaction between letter e)'s closing 50% paragraph and e).2.º's in-person wording is likewise not spelled out in the text; we read the specific sub-case as governing and say so. And individual consulates publish their own evidence practice — check your own post's current checklist
Frequently asked questions

Online and hybrid study against the visa — the questions that decide it

No. Every qualifying category in article 52.1 of RD 1155/2024 is written around in-person or majority-in-person study: language courses under e).2.º must be delivered "de forma presencial", non-university higher education, post-obligatory secondary and training activities carry an at-least-50%-in-person floor, and university degrees may be presencial or hybrid per the study plan and university regulation. A fully-online programme satisfies none of those wordings, and no insurance policy changes that.
Real, but not universal. The 50% floor is written into article 52.1 for non-university higher education, for post-obligatory secondary studies and for letter e) training activities. It is not written for university degrees — there the text says "modalidad presencial o híbrida" per the study plans and university law, with no percentage — and academy language courses under e).2.º are stricter, requiring in-person delivery outright. One figure for all categories is a flattening of five different wordings.
The regulation contains no weekly hour count as a study requirement — the only "veinte horas" in the consolidated text is the work-contract minimum in the work-compatibility rules, nothing to do with your course. The statutory full-time definition is article 52.2: enrolment in at least ninety per cent of the credits, or of the programme where credits do not apply. Hour figures you meet online come from individual consulates' published practice — San Francisco's page uses "minimum 20 hours per week" — or from schools. Check your own consulate's checklist; do not assume a national rule.
Not on the words of the text. Where article 52.1 sets a floor, it measures "la programación impartida" — the delivered programme — so what matters is how the teaching is delivered, not where the assessment happens. A programme taught online and examined in person does not become 50% presencial by the exam sitting, and for stays of 90 days or less around an exam or residential block, the short-stay regime is the relevant one anyway.
Possibly — letter a) expressly permits university studies "en modalidad presencial o híbrida", governed by the study plan and university regulation rather than by a percentage in the immigration text. Whether your specific programme qualifies is a question for your university's international office and the deciding consulate or oficina, on the programme's documents. If it does qualify, letter a) is the strongest study category — automatic work rights, the family route, and in-country filing among them.
No — and not only because it would be pointless. Contracting the Sanitas International Students plan requires proof of studies: a matriculation or enrolment certificate with start and end dates. Without a qualifying course there is nothing to evidence, on the insurance side or the visa side. Get the admission first, check the category and modality against the words on this page, and then price the cover — the certificate and the visa file will then be telling the same story.

This page describes the regulation's modality wording and how our cover fits around qualifying courses. Visa and authorisation decisions rest with the Spanish authorities.